Welcome to MacForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

BounceBack vs Retrospect

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
   Macintosh computer (Home) -> System RSS
Related Topics:
Retrospect 4.3 for the Mac - I have a G4 running System 9.1 I just noticed that I had a copy of 4.3 on my HD. I would like to do automatic backups to another HD. Will Express do that? Thanks, Sy

Retrospect & Tiger - Hi, Group. I found it that network backup software version 6.x needs a new version to work under Tiger, but the backup 5.0.238 seems to play nicely with Tiger. Anybody know why this is? I am curious.

Retrospect Error 518 - My long-used and totally reliable backup system just started giving me 518" errors on one, and only one Mac on my network is pre-OS-X, BTW). The message the error says something about "not enough client but the..

Retrospect 5.1 Workgroup for Mac - Has anyone had any issues with a -1028 error with 5.1 Workgroup Edition for Mac? I'm backing up four machines to a fifth one. The machines that display -1028 errors are random. If I start an immediate backup, all of the machines backup without..

Dantz Retrospect... - Is it possible to take a tape that was created using Dantz 5.0 under Mac OS 9.2 and restore it to a Mac running OS 10? The backed up data was just graphics files...
Next:  System: OS9.2 drivers for a DX4400 printer  
Author Message
Verne Arase

External


Since: May 22, 2004
Posts: 151



(Msg. 31) Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:29 pm
Post subject: Re: BounceBack vs Retrospect [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: comp>sys>mac>system (more info?)

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:34:47 -0600, Jolly Roger wrote
(in article
<jollyroger-856C6B.10344724022008.RemoveThis@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>):

> Then you must *really* hate Retrospect. : ) That's unfortunate,
> because there are some areas where Retrospect, despite its complex user
> interface, is way better than applications like SD and CCC.

Yes ... too bad it leaves so much metadata behind.

.... and now that it's been aquired by EMC, the Mac version seems be left in
maintenance mode ...

 >> Stay informed about: BounceBack vs Retrospect 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jolly Roger

External


Since: Sep 09, 2006
Posts: 2861



(Msg. 32) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:45 am
Post subject: Re: BounceBack vs Retrospect [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <0001HW.C3EE0DA7003D73CBF040E6D8 DeleteThis @news.giganews.com>,
Verne Arase <VerneA DeleteThis @pobox.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:34:47 -0600, Jolly Roger wrote
> (in article
> <jollyroger-856C6B.10344724022008 DeleteThis @earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>):
>
> > Then you must *really* hate Retrospect. : ) That's unfortunate,
> > because there are some areas where Retrospect, despite its complex user
> > interface, is way better than applications like SD and CCC.
>
> Yes ... too bad it leaves so much metadata behind.

In most cases, that's no big deal for me. Most of my restores are single
documents or folders with no special metadata assignments.

> ... and now that it's been aquired by EMC, the Mac version seems be left in
> maintenance mode ...

Actually that happened long before EMC got ahold of it. ; )

--
Note: Please send all responses to the relevant news group. If you
must contact me through e-mail, let me know when you send email to
this address so that your email doesn't get eaten by my SPAM filter.

JR

 >> Stay informed about: BounceBack vs Retrospect 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Macintosh computer (Home) -> System All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]