CL: Healer Tests

 >In article <20031226054031.26022.00001794.TakeThisOut@mb-m06.aol.com>,
 > stepkb.TakeThisOut@aol.com (StepKB) wrote:
 >
  >> Ok, I know this has been discussed over and over again. But...have we
 >gotten a
  >> rock solid answer from anyone at DT about it? I was gone OOC for like a
 >year
  >> and a half, was half expecting there to be some sort of new tests. Are
 >healer
  >> tests being worked on? I for one would love to seem them, it's been so long
  >> since new tests have been implemented.
 >
 >I think that healer tests will come after the Ranger subclass.
 >
 >You might consider talking to other healers and establishing tests run
 >by healers.
 >
 >- Thrund

If I remember right, this is what held up the test 2 years ago. Too many people
wanted tests tailored to their own character. I think DT should just design
their own and go with it. Personally I think harder healer tests as is would be
better than nothing. Afterall, thats essentially what the fighter tests are,
progressively harder critters.


Darnok<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: CL: Healer Tests 

StepKB <stepkb.DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote:

 > If I remember right, this is what held up the test 2 years ago. Too many
 > people wanted tests tailored to their own character. I think DT should
 > just design their own and go with it. Personally I think harder healer
 > tests as is would be better than nothing. Afterall, thats essentially what
 > the fighter tests are, progressively harder critters.
 >
 >
 > Darnok

I have to agree with Darnok. While I agree that it would be awsome to
have a test that tested real healer abilites as opposed to just higgy
and faustus bla bla bla, the bottom line is something is better than
nothing.

Though I wouldnt mind seeing a lot of the luck taken out of the tests.
A healer can get totally lucky and pass way before he should, while a
fighter cant do that (not near to the extent a healer can).

Michael<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: CL: Healer Tests