In article <1108752497.27687882da7014b46d98960c90d50ded@teranews>,
Greg R <webworm11.DeleteThis@lycos.com> wrote:
> So, your saying macox is a linux.
No, it isn't. But both Mac OS-X and Linux are Unixes (or anyway, unix
variants/derivatives). That is, you might say that Mac OS-X and Linux
are siblings.
If you are just looking for any Unix derivative for the Mac, might as
well at least try out OS-X first. It comes with the system anyway, so
you might as well try it first, even if you end up wiping it out for a
Linux install.
If you have specific requirements for a particular distribution, then
that's a different matter. It does happen. Or if you just like a
particular distribution, that's fine also.
But frankly, if you needed to ask questions like whether OS-X was a
Linux, then I doubt you have enough experience in such matters to worry
about the details of the differences.
I'm afraid that I've never heard of the "unburta" that you mention, and
neither has google. But I think one caution is in order...
If you need to run some application listed as being available for Linux,
you had better explicitly check that it is available for Linux on PPC
(the CPU type used by the Mac). If it just says "Linux" without
qualification, it very likely means just x86-based Linuxes, which means
that it won't run t all on a Mac (except under something like Virtual
PC, but that's quite an extra complication and would be a strange way to
go if that's all you wanted the Mac for).
--
Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience;
email: my first.last at org.domain | experience comes from bad judgment.
org: nasa, domain: gov | -- Mark Twain<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Mini more questions