 |
|
 |
|
Next: How to install *.sit font on OSX 10.4?
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Feb 18, 2004 Posts: 793
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: VPC Officially Dead [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: microsoft>public>mac>virtualpc (more info?)
|
|
|
In article ,
Steve Jain wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:35:15 -0600, Richard Cardona
> wrote:
>
> >Helpful Harry wrote:
> >> And hence the product is dead.
> >
> >VirtualPC for Mac is DEAD, Long Live Virtual PC Technical Support!
>
> So what is a product that a company no longer provides technical
> support for, if a dead product still gets techical support?
>
> A really dead product, a really, really, really dead product, an
> undead product, a double-dead product?
>
> It can't be dead if you can get help with it. In my experience with
> VPC-Mac over the past 6 years, MOST of the problems MOST users faced
> didn't need patches or updates, but just config help.
I used to work for Symantec, as a senior technical support engineer for
Symantec Gateway Security and Symantec Enterprise Firewall. In 2006
they decided to discontinue the product, and laid off many of the
developers. They kept some of them for bug fixing, and all the
technical support staff, but made it clear that they were planning on
transfering them to other products -- they expected the customers to
migrate to other products as their support contracts expired, so there
would be fewer support calls over time, and thus fewer support engineers
needed.
Most of us were not interested in hanging around, working on a dead-end
product, nor were we interested in supporting any of Symantec's other
products (many of my coworkers had been part of the Axent acquisition
several years earlier -- they had little experience or interest in the
Norton side of the company). I was one of the first to abandon ship,
but several others left within months.
The point of this is that even though the company may officially be
providing technical support, it's likely that the quality of this
support will fall off drastically. Most highly skilled engineers are
interested in working on active projects. So the people you'll find at
the other end of the line for a dead product will be entry-level, or
people who are supporting a variety of products; either way, they're not
going to be experts on this one.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar.DeleteThis@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** >> Stay informed about: VPC Officially Dead |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 27, 2003 Posts: 356
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 4:57 pm
Post subject: Re: VPC Officially Dead [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article ,
Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> Steve Jain wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:35:15 -0600, Richard Cardona
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Helpful Harry wrote:
> > >> And hence the product is dead.
> > >
> > >VirtualPC for Mac is DEAD, Long Live Virtual PC Technical Support!
> >
> > So what is a product that a company no longer provides technical
> > support for, if a dead product still gets techical support?
> >
> > A really dead product, a really, really, really dead product, an
> > undead product, a double-dead product?
> >
> > It can't be dead if you can get help with it. In my experience with
> > VPC-Mac over the past 6 years, MOST of the problems MOST users faced
> > didn't need patches or updates, but just config help.
>
> I used to work for Symantec, as a senior technical support engineer for
> Symantec Gateway Security and Symantec Enterprise Firewall. In 2006
> they decided to discontinue the product, and laid off many of the
> developers. They kept some of them for bug fixing, and all the
> technical support staff, but made it clear that they were planning on
> transfering them to other products -- they expected the customers to
> migrate to other products as their support contracts expired, so there
> would be fewer support calls over time, and thus fewer support engineers
> needed.
>
> Most of us were not interested in hanging around, working on a dead-end
> product, nor were we interested in supporting any of Symantec's other
> products (many of my coworkers had been part of the Axent acquisition
> several years earlier -- they had little experience or interest in the
> Norton side of the company). I was one of the first to abandon ship,
> but several others left within months.
>
> The point of this is that even though the company may officially be
> providing technical support, it's likely that the quality of this
> support will fall off drastically. Most highly skilled engineers are
> interested in working on active projects. So the people you'll find at
> the other end of the line for a dead product will be entry-level, or
> people who are supporting a variety of products; either way, they're not
> going to be experts on this one.
"Support" can stay around for decades, especially in an unofficial or
semi-official form (just look at the Amiga computer) or simply in a
companise web-archives, but once a company decides to stop making a
product it is officially dead ... no matter what a few hard core
fanatics on the Internet like to fool themselves into believing or how
many largely pointless petition attempts to have that decision revoked
are created. You see this all the time in the TV newsgroups - the
network decides to cancel a show and all the loonies come out of the
woodwork with "Save the show" petitions. :o\
Helpful Harry
Hopefully helping harassed humans happily handle handiwork hardships ;o) >> Stay informed about: VPC Officially Dead |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 17, 2004 Posts: 69
|
(Msg. 18) Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 4:57 pm
Post subject: Re: VPC Officially Dead [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Maybe DEAD was the wrong word I used when I announced Microsoft's decision
to no longer create patches. Regardless on how it is said we are using
machines (PPC) that Apple no longer makes and a piece of software that
Microsoft no longer (software) supports.
I guess it is dead when I no longer use it...
On 12/23/07 2:48 PM, in article
241220070848387325%helpful_harry@nom.de.plume.com, "Helpful Harry"
wrote:
> In article ,
> Barry Margolin wrote:
>
>> In article ,
>> Steve Jain wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:35:15 -0600, Richard Cardona
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Helpful Harry wrote:
>>>>> And hence the product is dead.
>>>>
>>>> VirtualPC for Mac is DEAD, Long Live Virtual PC Technical Support!
>>>
>>> So what is a product that a company no longer provides technical
>>> support for, if a dead product still gets techical support?
>>>
>>> A really dead product, a really, really, really dead product, an
>>> undead product, a double-dead product?
>>>
>>> It can't be dead if you can get help with it. In my experience with
>>> VPC-Mac over the past 6 years, MOST of the problems MOST users faced
>>> didn't need patches or updates, but just config help.
>>
>> I used to work for Symantec, as a senior technical support engineer for
>> Symantec Gateway Security and Symantec Enterprise Firewall. In 2006
>> they decided to discontinue the product, and laid off many of the
>> developers. They kept some of them for bug fixing, and all the
>> technical support staff, but made it clear that they were planning on
>> transfering them to other products -- they expected the customers to
>> migrate to other products as their support contracts expired, so there
>> would be fewer support calls over time, and thus fewer support engineers
>> needed.
>>
>> Most of us were not interested in hanging around, working on a dead-end
>> product, nor were we interested in supporting any of Symantec's other
>> products (many of my coworkers had been part of the Axent acquisition
>> several years earlier -- they had little experience or interest in the
>> Norton side of the company). I was one of the first to abandon ship,
>> but several others left within months.
>>
>> The point of this is that even though the company may officially be
>> providing technical support, it's likely that the quality of this
>> support will fall off drastically. Most highly skilled engineers are
>> interested in working on active projects. So the people you'll find at
>> the other end of the line for a dead product will be entry-level, or
>> people who are supporting a variety of products; either way, they're not
>> going to be experts on this one.
>
> "Support" can stay around for decades, especially in an unofficial or
> semi-official form (just look at the Amiga computer) or simply in a
> companise web-archives, but once a company decides to stop making a
> product it is officially dead ... no matter what a few hard core
> fanatics on the Internet like to fool themselves into believing or how
> many largely pointless petition attempts to have that decision revoked
> are created. You see this all the time in the TV newsgroups - the
> network decides to cancel a show and all the loonies come out of the
> woodwork with "Save the show" petitions. :o\
>
>
> Helpful Harry
> Hopefully helping harassed humans happily handle handiwork hardships ;o) >> Stay informed about: VPC Officially Dead |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 04, 2004 Posts: 68
|
(Msg. 19) Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 4:57 pm
Post subject: Re: VPC Officially Dead [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
That's a stretch. I think we are talking about support from MS in one form
or another.
"Helpful Harry" wrote in message
> In article ,
> Barry Margolin wrote:
>
>> In article ,
>> Steve Jain wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:35:15 -0600, Richard Cardona
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >Helpful Harry wrote:
>> > >> And hence the product is dead.
>> > >
>> > >VirtualPC for Mac is DEAD, Long Live Virtual PC Technical Support!
>> >
>> > So what is a product that a company no longer provides technical
>> > support for, if a dead product still gets techical support?
>> >
>> > A really dead product, a really, really, really dead product, an
>> > undead product, a double-dead product?
>> >
>> > It can't be dead if you can get help with it. In my experience with
>> > VPC-Mac over the past 6 years, MOST of the problems MOST users faced
>> > didn't need patches or updates, but just config help.
>>
>> I used to work for Symantec, as a senior technical support engineer for
>> Symantec Gateway Security and Symantec Enterprise Firewall. In 2006
>> they decided to discontinue the product, and laid off many of the
>> developers. They kept some of them for bug fixing, and all the
>> technical support staff, but made it clear that they were planning on
>> transfering them to other products -- they expected the customers to
>> migrate to other products as their support contracts expired, so there
>> would be fewer support calls over time, and thus fewer support engineers
>> needed.
>>
>> Most of us were not interested in hanging around, working on a dead-end
>> product, nor were we interested in supporting any of Symantec's other
>> products (many of my coworkers had been part of the Axent acquisition
>> several years earlier -- they had little experience or interest in the
>> Norton side of the company). I was one of the first to abandon ship,
>> but several others left within months.
>>
>> The point of this is that even though the company may officially be
>> providing technical support, it's likely that the quality of this
>> support will fall off drastically. Most highly skilled engineers are
>> interested in working on active projects. So the people you'll find at
>> the other end of the line for a dead product will be entry-level, or
>> people who are supporting a variety of products; either way, they're not
>> going to be experts on this one.
>
> "Support" can stay around for decades, especially in an unofficial or
> semi-official form (just look at the Amiga computer) or simply in a
> companise web-archives, but once a company decides to stop making a
> product it is officially dead ... no matter what a few hard core
> fanatics on the Internet like to fool themselves into believing or how
> many largely pointless petition attempts to have that decision revoked
> are created. You see this all the time in the TV newsgroups - the
> network decides to cancel a show and all the loonies come out of the
> woodwork with "Save the show" petitions. :o\
>
>
> Helpful Harry
> Hopefully helping harassed humans happily handle handiwork hardships ;o) >> Stay informed about: VPC Officially Dead |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 04, 2004 Posts: 68
|
(Msg. 20) Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 4:57 pm
Post subject: Re: VPC Officially Dead [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
You are right, of course. That's the only sensible way to think about it.
"Fred Horvat" wrote in message
> Maybe DEAD was the wrong word I used when I announced Microsoft's decision
> to no longer create patches. Regardless on how it is said we are using
> machines (PPC) that Apple no longer makes and a piece of software that
> Microsoft no longer (software) supports.
>
> I guess it is dead when I no longer use it...
>
>
> On 12/23/07 2:48 PM, in article
> 241220070848387325%helpful_harry@nom.de.plume.com, "Helpful Harry"
> wrote:
>
>> In article ,
>> Barry Margolin wrote:
>>
>>> In article ,
>>> Steve Jain wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:35:15 -0600, Richard Cardona
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Helpful Harry wrote:
>>>>>> And hence the product is dead.
>>>>>
>>>>> VirtualPC for Mac is DEAD, Long Live Virtual PC Technical Support!
>>>>
>>>> So what is a product that a company no longer provides technical
>>>> support for, if a dead product still gets techical support?
>>>>
>>>> A really dead product, a really, really, really dead product, an
>>>> undead product, a double-dead product?
>>>>
>>>> It can't be dead if you can get help with it. In my experience with
>>>> VPC-Mac over the past 6 years, MOST of the problems MOST users faced
>>>> didn't need patches or updates, but just config help.
>>>
>>> I used to work for Symantec, as a senior technical support engineer for
>>> Symantec Gateway Security and Symantec Enterprise Firewall. In 2006
>>> they decided to discontinue the product, and laid off many of the
>>> developers. They kept some of them for bug fixing, and all the
>>> technical support staff, but made it clear that they were planning on
>>> transfering them to other products -- they expected the customers to
>>> migrate to other products as their support contracts expired, so there
>>> would be fewer support calls over time, and thus fewer support engineers
>>> needed.
>>>
>>> Most of us were not interested in hanging around, working on a dead-end
>>> product, nor were we interested in supporting any of Symantec's other
>>> products (many of my coworkers had been part of the Axent acquisition
>>> several years earlier -- they had little experience or interest in the
>>> Norton side of the company). I was one of the first to abandon ship,
>>> but several others left within months.
>>>
>>> The point of this is that even though the company may officially be
>>> providing technical support, it's likely that the quality of this
>>> support will fall off drastically. Most highly skilled engineers are
>>> interested in working on active projects. So the people you'll find at
>>> the other end of the line for a dead product will be entry-level, or
>>> people who are supporting a variety of products; either way, they're not
>>> going to be experts on this one.
>>
>> "Support" can stay around for decades, especially in an unofficial or
>> semi-official form (just look at the Amiga computer) or simply in a
>> companise web-archives, but once a company decides to stop making a
>> product it is officially dead ... no matter what a few hard core
>> fanatics on the Internet like to fool themselves into believing or how
>> many largely pointless petition attempts to have that decision revoked
>> are created. You see this all the time in the TV newsgroups - the
>> network decides to cancel a show and all the loonies come out of the
>> woodwork with "Save the show" petitions. :o\
>>
>>
>> Helpful Harry
>> Hopefully helping harassed humans happily handle handiwork hardships ;o)
> >> Stay informed about: VPC Officially Dead |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 18, 2004 Posts: 793
|
(Msg. 21) Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 6:10 pm
Post subject: Re: VPC Officially Dead [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article ,
"Colin Barnhorst" wrote:
> That's a stretch. I think we are talking about support from MS in one form
> or another.
But some forms of support are useful, others are just lip service. In
the case of a cancelled product, it's more likely to be the latter.
And it's not even cancelled products that are like this, it also often
goes to products that are not part of the company's main product line.
If you have Comcast as your ISP, try getting technical support for
anything related to Usenet -- virtually none of the phone-line or live
chat techs have even heard of it, yet it's an officially supported part
of their Internet service.
Part of the reason may be that they out-sourced this service several
years ago, so few people in the company have had to have expertise in
it. And the same thing happens with cancelled products -- if there are
no developers, knowledge about the product tends to evaporate. Even if
you have support techs trained on the product, there's no one they can
consult with who knows details about how it works; all they know is
what's in their support knowledge base, which is no help when a new
problem arises.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar.DeleteThis@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** >> Stay informed about: VPC Officially Dead |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 26, 2008 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 22) Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 4:37 pm
Post subject: Re: VPC Officially Dead [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 27, 2008 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 23) Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:14 am
Post subject: Re: VPC Officially Dead [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article , Tim <> wrote:
> Virtual PC for Mac won't be dead<br>
> Until this forum is dead.<br>
> "That's rather scary,"<br>
> Said Harry and Barry.
Harry can talk to Barry who talks to Harry. <:) >> Stay informed about: VPC Officially Dead |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | VPC7 dead? - I was running VPC7 and that common message came up regarding virtual switching could not be started. Which is strange since I have been running successfully for just over a year. As it stated VPC will still work properly, until... after skipping throug...
Dead Mic/Intermittant Audio at URL - I'm running VPC 6.1.0/Win 2000 Pro on a 500MHz G3 iMac with OS 10.2.8, 640MB RAM, and 14.35 GB avail on HD; I don't know how to find out which PC ver of Explorer is installed. I have a dead Mic and intermittant Audio when I use VPC at ..
Dead Start PC button - I'm using 10.4.2 and VPC 7.0.2. I'm trying to create a disk image. After the Setup assistant gets to the last screen, there's a Start PC button but when I click on it nothing happens. I hit enter and nothing happens. It's like the button is dead or..
Fedora Core 6 and Dead Mouse - I'm using virtualPC 2004 and Fedora Core 6. I did a text mode install, edited xorg.conf for the color depth. All was well. I let pup (front end to yum) do a massive software update and now the mouse does not work in the virtual machine. I got no....
Mac laptop dead.. can I convert Virtual pc files? - My logic board failed in my 3 yr old mac laptop. The service provider was able to recover all my data off my hard drive. I'm switching back to a PC for the time being. Is there a tool or anything I can do to convert my mac virtual pc files to a.. |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|