In article <michelle-02A818.22255208022008.DeleteThis@news.west.cox.net>,
Michelle Steiner <michelle.DeleteThis@michelle.org> wrote:
> Of course, the people on this newsgroup who are actually interested in
> the product probably can be counted on the fingers of one hand.
Wow! - as many as 4 people!
I thought I was the only one.
I will be the first guy to agree that present day
speech recognition technology has limited value
for personal computer users.
The technology is just plain not good enough yet
for trivial use by the ordinary person.
Will not be good enough for decades yet.
Niche business uses are another story.
I copied this use of Dragon by a small medical group,
from a medical forum that I monitor.
The post is about Dragon medical.
(cost me $1,200, doctors can get it for a mere
$1,000 provided they make bulk purchases)
This post copied from a medical forum recently -
*****************************************************
Affording it is the easiest part, we spend over
$100,000 annually for transcription services
for 25 users. ($4,000 per year, per each user)
Switching to using Dragon, 25 Dragon licenses
cost $25,000 25 new laptops $25,000.
First year total cost after switching to Dragon $50,000.
First year savings, $100,000 minus $50,000 = $50,000.
Every year thereafter saved $100,000.
******************************************************
Even that poster does not realize he could save even more,
if he had switched to using Macs instead of PCs to run his
Dragon app's.
The added savings are realized by the much lower cost
of IT department support for Macs, as compared to PCs.
Any one of us concerned about medical costs can appreciate
the savings to the average person by medical groups using
present day speech technology, imperfect as it is.
Mark-
>> Stay informed about: Sour Grapes on MacWorld forum about MacSpeech Dictate