Welcome to MacForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

The cost of particles:

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2
   Macintosh computer (Home) -> System RSS
Related Topics:
Question? Will a g4/533 chip work in an APG? - Question? Will a g4/533 chip pulled from a G4 digital audio work in an G4 APG? Or a G3 beige? thanks

Help: DOS formatted ZIP disks in OS X (10.2.6) - I have several DOS formatted zip disks (zip-100) that are not read in OS X. They are read perfectly well when I reboot the computer in 9.2.2. My Mac formatted zip disks are read in OS X. I do have the most recent version of Iomega zip tools for OS X..

Help distributing new password for OS X - I am for changing the root password on a ton of OS X machines and want to do it securely. I may also be called upon to change another account password. I'm not a so I'd any leads on how to securely ..

lost ability to drag icons - I lost the ability to drag file icons. Menus function, and windows are dragable. Yet while file and folder icons they won't move. A new .dmg seems to have created the problem on my PowerBook 667 running OSX. When I tried to view the file..

Retrospect 4.3 for the Mac - I have a G4 running System 9.1 I just noticed that I had a copy of 4.3 on my HD. I would like to do automatic backups to another HD. Will Express do that? Thanks, Sy
Next:  System: Embedding Video in Web Pages  
Author Message
D.F. Manno

External


Since: Jul 05, 2006
Posts: 56



(Msg. 16) Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: The cost of particles: [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: comp>sys>mac>system (more info?)

In article <gkreme-0A15C5.16122024022008.DeleteThis@news.giganews.com>,
Lewis <gkreme.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:

> nospamatall <nospamatall.DeleteThis@iol.ie> wrote:
> > Harry Lockwood wrote:
> > > tacit <tacitr.DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote:
> > >> Michelle Steiner <michelle.DeleteThis@michelle.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Protons: $1.00
> > >>> Electrons: $0.10
> > >>> Neutrons: No charge
> > >> You can save money by buying quarks and assembling the protons
> > >> yourself...
> > >
> > > Yeah, but you'd have to gluon some neutrinos.
> > >
> > That would look strange.
> >
> > there aren't any more left are there?
>
> Strangely enough, there's some spare tops lying about. I find the whole
> conversation charming, but the constant up down motion is making me
> seasick.

Have you complained to the boson?

--
D.F. Manno | dfmanno.DeleteThis@mail.com
"They bury your dreams and dig up the worthless/Goodnight/God bless/And
kiss goodbye to the earth/The other side of summer"

 >> Stay informed about: The cost of particles: 
Back to top
Login to vote
Lewis

External


Since: Jan 19, 2008
Posts: 637



(Msg. 17) Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:07 am
Post subject: Re: The cost of particles: [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

This message is not archived

 >> Stay informed about: The cost of particles: 
Back to top
Login to vote
Joshua Whalen

External


Since: Jan 21, 2007
Posts: 37



(Msg. 18) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:09 pm
Post subject: Re: The cost of particles: [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <62bdhsF20tn4uU1.TakeThisOut@mid.individual.net>,
Steve Hodgson <hamrun.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2008-02-23 18:28:37 +0000, Michelle Steiner <michelle.TakeThisOut@michelle.org> said:
>
> > Protons: $1.00
> > Electrons: $0.10
> > Neutrons: No charge
>
> Surely that should be electrons -$1.00 :o)

actually, in my town (NYC) electrons go for about $0.15.

Bogons, however, are free. In fact, we'll pay you to haul them away, we
have a big surplus, what with all the bankers, corporate lawyers, and
what not.

Cluons, on the other hand, are priceless. With all the suits around
here, they get annihilated almost the moment they come into existence.
If it weren't for all the computers and pervasive internet access, we
wouldn't have any.

As to the state itself, I'm uncertain

Joshua
 >> Stay informed about: The cost of particles: 
Back to top
Login to vote
Tom Stiller

External


Since: Jul 13, 2003
Posts: 2731



(Msg. 19) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:14 pm
Post subject: Re: The cost of particles: [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <joshuafwhalen-D1B4CB.15090426022008.DeleteThis@reader2.panix.com>,
Joshua Whalen <joshuafwhalen.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:

> In article <62bdhsF20tn4uU1.DeleteThis@mid.individual.net>,
> Steve Hodgson <hamrun.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2008-02-23 18:28:37 +0000, Michelle Steiner <michelle.DeleteThis@michelle.org> said:
> >
> > > Protons: $1.00
> > > Electrons: $0.10
> > > Neutrons: No charge
> >
> > Surely that should be electrons -$1.00 :o)
>
> actually, in my town (NYC) electrons go for about $0.15.
>
> Bogons, however, are free. In fact, we'll pay you to haul them away, we
> have a big surplus, what with all the bankers, corporate lawyers, and
> what not.
>
> Cluons, on the other hand, are priceless. With all the suits around
> here, they get annihilated almost the moment they come into existence.
> If it weren't for all the computers and pervasive internet access, we
> wouldn't have any.
>
> As to the state itself, I'm uncertain
>
> Joshua

Some newer particles are found in the newly discovered element:
Administratium

Investigators at a major US research university recently discovered the
heaviest element known to science. The element, tentatively named
Administratium, has no protons or electrons and thus has an atomic
number of 0. However, it does have one neutron, 125 assistant neutrons,
75 vice neutrons and 111 assistant vice neutrons, which gives it an
atomic mass of 312.

These 312 particles are held together by a force that involves the
continuous exchange of meson-like particles called morons. It is also
surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons.

Since it has no electrons, Administratium is inert. However, it can be
detected chemically as it impedes every reaction it comes in contact
with. According to its discoverers, a minute amount of Administratium
causes one reaction to take over four days to complete, which would
normally have occurred in less than a second.

Administratium has a normal half-life of approximately three years, at
which time it does not decay, but instead undergoes a reorganization in
which a portion of the assistant neutrons, vice neutrons and assistant
vice neurons exchange places. In fact, an Administratium sample's mass
actually INCREASES over time - with each reorganization, some of the
morons inevitably become neutrons, forming new isodopes.

This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to
speculate that perhaps Administratium is spontaneously formed whenever
morons reach a certain quantity in concentration. This hypothetical
quantity is referred to as "critical morass."

Research at other laboratories indicates that Administratium occurs
naturally in the large companies, healthcare facilities and
universities; and will often be found in the newest, best-maintained
buildings.


Scientists point out that Administratium is known to be toxic at any
level of concentration and can easily destroy any productive reactions
where it is allowed to accumulate.

--
Tom Stiller

PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3 7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF
 >> Stay informed about: The cost of particles: 
Back to top
Login to vote
Lewis

External


Since: Jan 19, 2008
Posts: 637



(Msg. 20) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:58 pm
Post subject: Re: The cost of particles: [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
Harry Lockwood

External


Since: Feb 03, 2007
Posts: 33



(Msg. 21) Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:42 pm
Post subject: Re: The cost of particles: [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <gkreme-5FCEF0.22582126022008 RemoveThis @news.giganews.com>,
Lewis <gkreme RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:

> In article <tomstiller-31A147.16144326022008 RemoveThis @newsgroups.comcast.net>,
> Tom Stiller <tomstiller RemoveThis @comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > Some newer particles are found in the newly discovered element:
> > Administratium
> >
> > Investigators at a major US research university recently discovered the
> > heaviest element known to science. The element, tentatively named
> > Administratium, has no protons or electrons and thus has an atomic
> > number of 0. However, it does have one neutron, 125 assistant neutrons,
> > 75 vice neutrons and 111 assistant vice neutrons, which gives it an
> > atomic mass of 312.
> >
> > These 312 particles are held together by a force that involves the
> > continuous exchange of meson-like particles called morons. It is also
> > surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons.
> >
> > Since it has no electrons, Administratium is inert. However, it can be
> > detected chemically as it impedes every reaction it comes in contact
> > with. According to its discoverers, a minute amount of Administratium
> > causes one reaction to take over four days to complete, which would
> > normally have occurred in less than a second.
> >
> > Administratium has a normal half-life of approximately three years, at
> > which time it does not decay, but instead undergoes a reorganization in
> > which a portion of the assistant neutrons, vice neutrons and assistant
> > vice neurons exchange places. In fact, an Administratium sample's mass
> > actually INCREASES over time - with each reorganization, some of the
> > morons inevitably become neutrons, forming new isodopes.
> >
> > This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to
> > speculate that perhaps Administratium is spontaneously formed whenever
> > morons reach a certain quantity in concentration. This hypothetical
> > quantity is referred to as "critical morass."
> >
> > Research at other laboratories indicates that Administratium occurs
> > naturally in the large companies, healthcare facilities and
> > universities; and will often be found in the newest, best-maintained
> > buildings.
> >
> >
> > Scientists point out that Administratium is known to be toxic at any
> > level of concentration and can easily destroy any productive reactions
> > where it is allowed to accumulate.
>
> That is absolutely brilliant!

You beat me to it. I agree.

HFL

--
Change hlockwood to hflockwood in email address
 >> Stay informed about: The cost of particles: 
Back to top
Login to vote
nospamatall

External


Since: May 01, 2007
Posts: 289



(Msg. 22) Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:17 pm
Post subject: Re: The cost of particles: [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Harry Lockwood wrote:

>> That is absolutely brilliant!
>
> You beat me to it. I agree.
>
> HFL

If you want to write good articles about nuclear stuff, consider asking
your local power plant for access to their long term repository, where
they store long terms with which to baffle their opponents.

Andy
 >> Stay informed about: The cost of particles: 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ed Anson

External


Since: Jul 11, 2004
Posts: 90



(Msg. 23) Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:23 pm
Post subject: Re: The cost of particles: [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

What a strange element! Luckily, there's a limit to how much of it can
exist in the Universe... otherwise it would prevent any motion
whatsoever and violate the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

[Thanks to my son, Erik]


Tom Stiller wrote:
> Some newer particles are found in the newly discovered element:
> Administratium
>
> Investigators at a major US research university recently discovered the
> heaviest element known to science. The element, tentatively named
> Administratium, has no protons or electrons and thus has an atomic
> number of 0. However, it does have one neutron, 125 assistant neutrons,
> 75 vice neutrons and 111 assistant vice neutrons, which gives it an
> atomic mass of 312.
>
> These 312 particles are held together by a force that involves the
> continuous exchange of meson-like particles called morons. It is also
> surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons.
>
> Since it has no electrons, Administratium is inert. However, it can be
> detected chemically as it impedes every reaction it comes in contact
> with. According to its discoverers, a minute amount of Administratium
> causes one reaction to take over four days to complete, which would
> normally have occurred in less than a second.
>
> Administratium has a normal half-life of approximately three years, at
> which time it does not decay, but instead undergoes a reorganization in
> which a portion of the assistant neutrons, vice neutrons and assistant
> vice neurons exchange places. In fact, an Administratium sample's mass
> actually INCREASES over time - with each reorganization, some of the
> morons inevitably become neutrons, forming new isodopes.
>
> This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to
> speculate that perhaps Administratium is spontaneously formed whenever
> morons reach a certain quantity in concentration. This hypothetical
> quantity is referred to as "critical morass."
>
> Research at other laboratories indicates that Administratium occurs
> naturally in the large companies, healthcare facilities and
> universities; and will often be found in the newest, best-maintained
> buildings.
>
>
> Scientists point out that Administratium is known to be toxic at any
> level of concentration and can easily destroy any productive reactions
> where it is allowed to accumulate.
>
 >> Stay informed about: The cost of particles: 
Back to top
Login to vote
Warren Oates

External


Since: Nov 16, 2005
Posts: 1380



(Msg. 24) Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:13 am
Post subject: Re: The cost of particles: [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <gkreme-5FCEF0.22582126022008 DeleteThis @news.giganews.com>,
Lewis <gkreme DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:

>
> That is absolutely brilliant!

I agree. That's the kind of thing that winds up being one of those

Fwd:fwd:fwd:

messages. Tom should assert his copyrights! Great stuff. This is all
Michele's fault, right?
--
W. Oates
 >> Stay informed about: The cost of particles: 
Back to top
Login to vote
Michelle Steiner

External


Since: Jul 15, 2003
Posts: 6223



(Msg. 25) Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:52 am
Post subject: Re: The cost of particles: [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
Tom Stiller

External


Since: Jul 13, 2003
Posts: 2731



(Msg. 26) Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:13 am
Post subject: Re: The cost of particles: [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <fq68hq$jhf$1@news.mixmin.net>,
Warren Oates <warren.oates.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:

> In article <gkreme-5FCEF0.22582126022008.DeleteThis@news.giganews.com>,
> Lewis <gkreme.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > That is absolutely brilliant!
>
> I agree. That's the kind of thing that winds up being one of those
>
> Fwd:fwd:fwd:
>
> messages. Tom should assert his copyrights! Great stuff. This is all
> Michele's fault, right?

Hey, it ain't mine!

I've had it for a long time and don't remember where I got it. After I
cleaned up the formatting for posting I hit the "post" button before I
composed the (lack of) attribution. :-(

--
Tom Stiller

PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3 7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF
 >> Stay informed about: The cost of particles: 
Back to top
Login to vote
Nollaig MacKenzie

External


Since: Oct 20, 2007
Posts: 34



(Msg. 27) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:44 pm
Post subject: Re: The cost of particles: [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 2008.02.23 18:28:37,
the amazing <michelle.TakeThisOut@michelle.org> declared:

> Protons: $1.00
> Electrons: $0.10
> Neutrons: No charge

This undercuts the regulated price. I'm reporting you to
the Particle Board.

--
Nollaig MacKenzie
http://www.amhuinnsuidhe.net
 >> Stay informed about: The cost of particles: 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Macintosh computer (Home) -> System All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]