In article <m2wu25vh7j.fsf.DeleteThis@qqqq.invalid>,
shamino.DeleteThis@techie.com (David C.) wrote:
> almost all of my floppies, and all of my tapes and Zips still work
> fine after many years (nearly 20 years in the case of my Apple II
> 5.25" floppies.)
I'd chalk that up to luck. I've never had CD-R's become unreadable,
but I've had floppies and tapes (DC20's, 1/4", 9-Track, 4mm, 8mm and
those funky square tapes that DEC's used to use) die. The only time
I've heard of optical media dieing was due to mechanical damage
(scratches and cracks).
I transferred alll of my floppy back-ups to tape when I got the tape
drive (the floppies were dieing) and then I transferred my tapes to
CD-R (I had a tape die and lost three months of back-ups). So, with
the exception of that one three month period, I can pretty mush
retreive any version of any file that's been on my computers since
the late 80's.
> As long as you keep them away from magnets and high humidity,
> magnetic media is great for archives.
I would not say that at all. Tapes get gummy after a while and
that's even faster if the humidity isn't controlled. Optical media
(not sure about re-writable) is far more stable and it's far eaiser
to keep things dark than dry, but not too dry.
Tapes are good for fast, high capacity, near total restoration in the
even of a failure back-ups. Optical is much better for long term
archiving, access to individual files back-ups.
--
A: No. See: Help, I'm
<http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html> being held
<http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting> in a .sig
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? factory!<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: "incremental backup"