Welcome to MacForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Who needs this sort of compression?

 
   Macintosh computer (Home) -> Word RSS
Next:  Useless link  
Author Message
mudaki

External


Since: Nov 24, 2004
Posts: 3



(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:28 am
Post subject: Who needs this sort of compression?
Archived from groups: microsoft>public>mac>office>word (more info?)

Microsoft Office Picture Manager promises to compress pictures for smaller
size and faster loading, but...

http://www.zima.net/fun_eng.html

--
Vadim Zima
Certified Russian translator and court interpreter
www.zima.net

 >> Stay informed about: Who needs this sort of compression? 
Back to top
Login to vote
John McGhie1

External


Since: May 22, 2004
Posts: 1819



(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 5:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Who needs this sort of compression? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Hi Vadim:

Ummm... Perhaps you should have read the instructions :-)

You took a small JPEG and resized it to 1024 x 768 at 300 dpi for
"Printing". Yeah, it will get a bit bigger. As a professional
photographer, YOU should know that...

OK, maybe Microsoft should use the word "adjustment" instead of
"compression", but it was trying to produce a tool for absolute newbies who
have no idea about this stuff.

The tool gives you the options of "Best, Good, Fair, and Low" quality and
size. If your original starts off below the quality standard you choose,
the tool will up-sample it.

But I would have thought a professional photographer on a Mac could probably
afford a copy of PhotoShop to do this kind of stuff in :-)

That said, I must admit to keeping a copy of Microsoft Photo Editor handy.
This little freeware tool from Office 2000 is just sooo convenient for
quickly cropping and resizing bitmaps :-)

Office Picture Manager is its "replacement". Personally, I think it's
toxic. It's so determined to "help" that it gets in the way. If I have to
do anything more than cropping/resizing/colour balancing, I fire up
PhotoPaint.

Cheers

On 25/11/04 5:28 AM, in article BDCA12C9.29E7%mudaki@zima.net, "spam_killer"
<mudaki RemoveThis @zima.net> wrote:

 > Microsoft Office Picture Manager promises to compress pictures for smaller
 > size and faster loading, but...
 >
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.zima.net/fun_eng.html</font" target="_blank">http://www.zima.net/fun_eng.html</font</a>>

--

Please reply to the newsgroup to maintain the thread. Please do not email
me unless I ask you to.

John McGhie <john RemoveThis @mcghie.name>
Consultant Technical Writer
Sydney, Australia +61 4 1209 1410<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: Who needs this sort of compression? 
Back to top
Login to vote
JE McGimpsey

External


Since: Mar 07, 2004
Posts: 3828



(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 5:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Who needs this sort of compression? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <BDCB505B.D4BD%john@mcghie.name>,
John McGhie <john.RemoveThis@mcghie.name> wrote:

 > But I would have thought a professional photographer on a Mac could probably
 > afford a copy of PhotoShop to do this kind of stuff in :-)

As an alternative, the (free) Gimp 2.0, running in Apple's (free) X11
does nearly everything that I'd use Photoshop for, though it has fewer
bells and whistles.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Who needs this sort of compression? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Corentin Cras-Mneu

External


Since: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 124



(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 5:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Who needs this sort of compression? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:11:25 -0600, JE McGimpsey wrote
(in article <jemcgimpsey-A15DC4.15112524112004.RemoveThis@msnews.microsoft.com>):

 > As an alternative, the (free) Gimp 2.0, running in Apple's (free) X11
 > does nearly everything that I'd use Photoshop for, though it has fewer
 > bells and whistles.

Gimp is a little heavy and I'm not a huge fan of the X11 GUI. If Photoshop is
too expensive, you could at least invest in a license of GraphicConverter.

Corentin


--
--- Mac:MS MVP (Francophone) ---
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.mvps.org/" target="_blank">http://www.mvps.org/</a> <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/" target="_blank">http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/</a>
MVPs are not MS employees... / Les MVP ne travaillent pas pour MS...
Retirez NoSpam de mon adresse pour m'écrire / Remove NoSpam to e-mail me<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Who needs this sort of compression? 
Back to top
Login to vote
JE McGimpsey

External


Since: Mar 07, 2004
Posts: 3828



(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 5:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Who needs this sort of compression? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <0001HW.BDCA67D9000F48E4F03865C0.TakeThisOut@news.microsoft.com>,
Corentin Cras-Méneur <korventeen.TakeThisOut@NoSpam.mvps.org> wrote:

 > Gimp is a little heavy and I'm not a huge fan of the X11 GUI. If Photoshop is
 > too expensive, you could at least invest in a license of GraphicConverter.

I use GraphicConverter for most things (and it comes free with Panther),
but for layers and filters, Gimp works better for me.

Of course, I'm nothing like a professional photographer...<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Who needs this sort of compression? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Michel Bintener1

External


Since: Oct 23, 2004
Posts: 424



(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Who needs this sort of compression? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

GraphicConverter was part of the software that was pre-installed on my
Powerbook, but I don't think that it comes free with Panther. Unless I'm
missing something.
Anyway, I can only recommend Photoshop Elements. I haven't tried the latest
version (v.3.0) yet, but I've been using v.2.0 for over two years now, and
I'm really satisfied with it. It offers the same functionality as Gimp (if
not even more, I haven't really tried Gimp since I don't like the X11
environment). And it is more advanced than GC when it comes to editing
photos. Don't get me wrong, GC is excellent, and I still use it because it
can open more file formats than PSE can. Still, being an casual
photographer, I just love PSE. And let's face it, for the features you get,
it's really not that expensive. Sorry for going on about this, but I just
love this application.


On 24.11.04 22:37, in article
jemcgimpsey-D129D5.15374524112004.RemoveThis@msnews.microsoft.com, "JE McGimpsey"
<jemcgimpsey.RemoveThis@mvps.org> wrote:

 > In article <0001HW.BDCA67D9000F48E4F03865C0.RemoveThis@news.microsoft.com>,
 > Corentin Cras-Méneur <korventeen.RemoveThis@NoSpam.mvps.org> wrote:
 >
  >> Gimp is a little heavy and I'm not a huge fan of the X11 GUI. If Photoshop is
  >> too expensive, you could at least invest in a license of GraphicConverter.
 >
 > I use GraphicConverter for most things (and it comes free with Panther),
 > but for layers and filters, Gimp works better for me.
 >
 > Of course, I'm nothing like a professional photographer...<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Who needs this sort of compression? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Macintosh computer (Home) -> Word All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]